BML.
A scientist in a face mask looking through a microscope in a bright labResearch

Monitoring the science

Studies that may shape what doctors advise, translated out of journal language: what was found, how strong the evidence is, and where to read the paper.

Updated 25 Sep 20266 studiesPeer-reviewed only

Six studies, checked and sourced

No preprints and no press releases. Each entry links to the paper on PubMed. These are summaries of what a study found, not advice on what you should do.

Newest first

Brain healthHuman trial, moderate evidence

A coached lifestyle program protected thinking skills a bit better than going it alone

In 2,111 at-risk US adults aged 60–79, two years of structured exercise, MIND-style diet, brain training and regular group check-ins lifted cognitive scores slightly more than a self-guided version of the same habits. Both groups improved, and the extra benefit held for APOE4 gene carriers too.

Study
Structured vs Self-Guided Multidomain Lifestyle Interventions for Global Cognitive Function: The US POINTER Randomised Clinical Trial
Journal
JAMA, Aug 26, 2025 (Vol 334, Issue 8; online Jul 28, 2025)
Design
Randomised clinical trial, 2,111 adults at elevated risk of cognitive decline, 5 US sites, 2 years; structured vs self-guided program
Authors
Baker LD, Espeland MA, Whitmer RA, Snyder HM, Leng X, et al. (US POINTER Study Group)
SleepLarge human study, strong evidence

A consistent bedtime may matter more than hitting 8 hours

Tracking sleep patterns in 60,977 UK adults over 7 years, researchers found how regular your sleep schedule is predicted death risk more strongly than how many hours you actually slept.

Study
Sleep regularity is a stronger predictor of mortality risk than sleep duration: A prospective cohort study
Journal
Sleep, Jan 2024 (Vol 47, Issue 1, zsad253)
Design
Prospective cohort, 60,977 adults with valid actigraphy data, UK Biobank (1,859 deaths over follow-up)
Authors
Windred DP, Burns AC, Lane JM, Saxena R, Rutter MK, Cain SW, Phillips AJK
Longevity drugsAnimal study, early evidence

Clearing "zombie cells" extended survival in aged mice, but human evidence is still early

A two-drug combination that clears senescent ("zombie") cells improved physical function and extended post-treatment survival by 36% in naturally aged mice. It's a mouse study: nothing yet shows the same longevity effect in people.

Study
Senolytics improve physical function and increase lifespan in old age
Journal
Nature Medicine, Aug 1, 2018 (Vol 24, pages 1246–1256)
Design
Preclinical, naturally aged and senescent-cell-transplanted mice, Mayo Clinic (not a human trial)
Authors
Xu M, Pirtskhalava T, Farr JN, Weigand BM, Palmer AK, Weivoda MM, et al.
SupplementsReview of existing research, moderate evidence

Creatine helps older adults hold onto muscle, but only alongside training, not instead of it

Pooling 11 randomised trials in adults 60+, creatine added a modest but real strength benefit on top of resistance training. The effect size was small: training was still doing most of the work.

Study
Effects of resistance training combined with creatine supplementation on muscle strength, physical function, and muscle mass in older adults: a systematic review and three-level meta-analysis
Journal
Frontiers in Nutrition, 2026 (Vol 13)
Design
Systematic review & three-level meta-analysis, 11 RCTs, adults 60+ (effect size g = 0.31 for strength vs. resistance training alone)
DietHuman trial, moderate evidence

Eating in an 8-hour window didn't beat plain calorie counting

In a year-long trial of 139 adults with obesity, restricting eating to 8am–4pm plus calorie restriction produced statistically similar weight loss, waist circumference and blood-marker results to calorie restriction alone.

Study
Calorie Restriction with or without Time-Restricted Eating in Weight Loss
Journal
New England Journal of Medicine, Apr 21, 2022 (Vol 386, No 16)
Design
Randomised controlled trial, 139 adults with obesity, 12 months, Guangzhou, China
Authors
Liu D, Huang Y, Huang C, Yang S, Wei X, Zhang P, et al.
ExerciseLarge human study, strong evidence

Your fitness level predicts survival better than almost anything else doctors measure

Tracking 122,007 adults referred for treadmill testing at the Cleveland Clinic, researchers found the least fit had a death rate on par with major chronic diseases, while the fittest kept seeing benefits with no upper limit.

Study
Association of Cardiorespiratory Fitness With Long-term Mortality Among Adults Undergoing Exercise Treadmill Testing
Journal
JAMA Network Open, Oct 19, 2018
Design
Retrospective cohort, 122,007 adults, Cleveland Clinic exercise-testing database (1991–2014)
Authors
Mandsager K, Harb S, Cremer P, Phelan D, Nissen SE, Jaber W
How to read the labels
  • Large human study
  • Review of existing research
  • Human trial
  • Animal study

The label is the study's design, not our opinion of it. A large human study can still only show a link, not cause and effect; an animal study shows what happened in animals.

See what's actually available in Australia

Reading the research is one half. Comparing real providers and products is the other: 22 testing providers, each price checked and dated.

How we choose what goes here

How do you decide what's covered here, and how is it checked?

Every entry starts from a peer-reviewed paper found through PubMed, never a preprint, a press release or a second-hand write-up. We read the paper's abstract and, where it's open, the full text, then write a plain-English headline and summary of what the study found, not what a headline claimed. The study design label tells you how much weight the finding can carry, so you can judge it yourself. Every entry links to the paper.

Compiled 10 Sep 2026

Is anything on this page medical advice?

No. This page reports what a study found, in the study's own terms. It never says what a finding means for you and never recommends a course of action. An animal study and a large human study are described in equally plain words but carry very different labels, on purpose. Talk to your own GP before acting on anything here.

How often is this page updated?

New studies are added from time to time, each checked against the paper itself before it goes up. There is no fixed schedule, and nothing is published automatically.

Updated 25 Sep 2026

Not medical advice. These are factual summaries of published papers. Talk to your GP about what's right for you.